| Tuesday, September 30, 2003 |
|---|
Did PowerPoint kill Columbia?
In his classic book Visual Explanations Edward R. Tufte shows how bad presentation of information had catastrophic consequence in making decision to launch the Space Shuttle Challenger on January 28, 1986.In his recent essay The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint (excellent read by the way, it is well worth the $7, buy a copy to everyone in your school or company who is PowerPoint-addict) Tufte analyzes the key slide in the Boeing report on Space Shuttle Columbia. The reports provided the rationale for NASA officials to curtail further research (such as photographing the Columbia with spy cameras) on the tiles during the flight.
Did
PowerPoint kill Columbia? Find out for yourself on Tufte's web site:
ET on Columbia Evidence—Analysis of Key Slide, also:
Report of Columbia Accident Investigation Board: The Boeing PowerPoint Slide.
|
Posted by Branimir Dolicki at 12:38 |
|
# - G - Add comment |
SPAM Filters That Fight Back!
I've been using SpamAssassin for some time now and I'm really pleased - the amount of spam I have to deal with manually has reduced to maybe 5% of the original. Especially interesting is filtering with Bayesian Classifier. Bayesian Classifier (explained at Paul Graham's Web site) learns from the past messages that you marked as spam or nonspam.Now, I find the last idea from Paul Graham Filters That Fight Back really cool. I mean, no matter how well my filters work they can't really do anything to prevent spam. Spam exists because there is (and I guess will always be) a tiny little fraction of people that actually read and respond to spam. No kidding. Such people really exist. They don't filter spam. So what can the vast majoriy of people who don't read spam and don't want spam actively do against spam? Paul Graham's idea is: have a program that will automatically follow every URL in the spam. If many did that, spammers' costs would grow linearly with amount of spam they send.
Long time ago I heard someone say that we should always call the 800 numbers advertised in the spam: call the number and go to lunch break. That way we would cost spammers money. The problem with that is that this process is hard (even impossible in some cases) to automate. The crawling idea can easily be automated.
|
Posted by Branimir Dolicki at 11:51 |
|
# - G - Add comment |
You may request notification for Branimir's Blog.